Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Human vs. artificial art: The people, laws, tools working against AI exploitation

With concerns growing over AI exploitation in art communities, initiatives like Take Part In Art and tools such as Glaze and Nightshade promote possible solutions

SciTech-take-part-in-art-AZ.png

Photo illustration of the First baptist Church of Pasadena on Friday Oct. 25, 2024 in Pasadena, Calif. Additional illustrated elements added on Tuesday, De. 3, 2024. 


Many artists today showcase their work on social media or other online platforms, seeking recognition and community from others. However, the rise of artificial intelligence has created obstacles for keeping original art safe online.

On Sept. 27, 2023, Meta announced in Privacy Matters: Meta’s Generative AI Features that "Publicly shared posts from Instagram and Facebook – including photos and text – were part of the data used to train the generative AI models underlying the features we announced at Connect."

Take Part In Art, founded by Alexandra Jacapraro, a junior studying aerospace engineering, has dedicated itself to supporting artists through numerous activities, including advocating to protect artists from AI exploitation, promoting artwork and spotlighting local events.

Jacapraro, who participates in pageants such as Miss Valley of the Sun, was motivated to found Take Part In Art as her community service initiative after reflecting on the issues that the artist community has had to face.

"Art is near and dear to my heart, and when it came time to pick a community service initiative, I thought, what better outlet to go than art?" Jacapraro said. "There's no real protection for the artist community, and this goes for … all arts too, not just visual, so that's why I started Take Part In Art."

The organization also promoted the NO FAKES Act of 2024 after it was introduced to the Senate on July 31. The bill aims to protect the voice and likeness of all individuals from AI and other technologies used without their consent.

The concern about AI's role in art creation is shared by many. For School of Art co-directors Cristóbal Martínez and Forrest Solis, AI is nothing more than a tool.

"It does not feel emotions and therefore cannot overshadow human creativity," Martínez said in an email. "It only has the capacity to emulate us, but this tool does not have the intellectual capacity to feel emotional about what it generates. AI may generate interesting images, but in the end, it is still left to our human creativity to determine the meanings of images."

Given these limitations, it becomes clear that the one key strategy to minimizing the negative impact of AI on the art community is ensuring that human creativity remains at the forefront.

"We must always seek to maintain our humanity by developing critical thinking skills," Martínez wrote.

In addition to fostering critical thinking, there are emerging technologies to help protect artists' rights. These tools include Glaze, an app designed to protect artists' works from AI by disrupting style mimicry, and Nightshade, a tool that actively poisons AI by transforming images into a data sample unsuitable for model training.

The Glaze Project, which includes free-to-use Glaze, Nightshade and other programs, is a research initiative led by computer science professors and PhD students at the University of Chicago. Its ultimate goal is to develop tools to protect human creatives from unauthorized or exploitative use of generative AI.

"What Nightshade is doing is similar to the dog-cat analogy thing where, if you have an image of a dog, the AI comes over, or somebody sends this image to an AI, and its data is poisoned, so that AI reads it as being an image of a cat," Jacapraro said. "Every time somebody asks that AI, 'Can you please give me an image of a dog?' It’s going to give you a cat, because it’s been given poisoned data."

While tools like Glaze and Nightshade were designed as a safeguard to protect artists' works from AI exploitation, Martínez noted a potential drawback: protecting art for monetary or copyright purposes could contribute to the idea that art is only valuable as a commodity. 

"When considering (art's) value through the lens of many cultures, it may be quite detrimental to society to deny AI access to art since it is predicted to be so influential in our decision-making," Martínez wrote. "Can you imagine that we would put so much stock in an intelligence devoid of our values, much of which are encoded in art? I can’t imagine the outcome being good, beautiful or true."

AI's level of access to art online is still an ongoing debate, but tools such as Glaze and Nightshade demonstrate the determination of the artist community to fight back against AI exploitation.

According to Martínez, if art creates meaning for human intelligences, it may do the same for AI, potentially expanding its horizons.

"Harm can come from so many of the tools we create, including AI," Martínez wrote. "Therefore, its important for artists to think about, use and critically engage apps that defend against AI."

Edited by River Graziano, Sophia Braccio and Madeline Schmitke.


Reach the reporter at hhuynh18@asu.edu.

Like The State Press on Facebook and follow @statepress on X.


Continue supporting student journalism and donate to The State Press today.

Subscribe to Pressing Matters



×

Notice

This website uses cookies to make your experience better and easier. By using this website you consent to our use of cookies. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.